On Friday 16 April 2010 01:50:24 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Dan Fandrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:02:20PM +0200, Nguy�n Thái Ng�c Duy wrote: > >> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32),y) > > > > Many parts of this patch series depend on CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32. But it > > seems many instances are really specific to MingW32 rather than > > generically Win32. If someone later does a Cygwin port, or a MSVC port, I > > imagine much of what's conditionally compiled with CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32 > > won't be relevant. Does it make sense to change this variable to > > CONFIG_TARGET_MINGW32 instead? > > As far as I know, there are three big compilers on Windows: MSVC, > MinGW and Cygwin.
Tinycc has effectively turned into a windows-only compiler under the current maintainer. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
