On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 16 April 2010 01:50:24 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Dan Fandrich <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:02:20PM +0200, Nguy�n Thái Ng�c Duy wrote: >> >> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32),y) >> > >> > Many parts of this patch series depend on CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32. But it >> > seems many instances are really specific to MingW32 rather than >> > generically Win32. If someone later does a Cygwin port, or a MSVC port, I >> > imagine much of what's conditionally compiled with CONFIG_TARGET_WIN32 >> > won't be relevant. Does it make sense to change this variable to >> > CONFIG_TARGET_MINGW32 instead? >> >> As far as I know, there are three big compilers on Windows: MSVC, >> MinGW and Cygwin. > > Tinycc has effectively turned into a windows-only compiler under the current > maintainer.
Thanks. I'll check it out. -- Duy _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
