On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > those off. CONFIG_SELINUX hardly builds _anywhere_. A dozen of our applets > won't build under Red Hat 9 anymore (just too old), but rather a lot still > _do_.
Yes. I just checked. defconfig doesn't build on that image, I needed to remove a few applets from config: -CONFIG_FEATURE_HWIB=y +# CONFIG_FEATURE_HWIB is not set -CONFIG_ACPID=y -CONFIG_FEATURE_ACPID_COMPAT=y +# CONFIG_ACPID is not set +# CONFIG_FEATURE_ACPID_COMPAT is not set -CONFIG_MKFS_EXT2=y +# CONFIG_MKFS_EXT2 is not set -CONFIG_FLASHCP=y -CONFIG_FLASH_LOCK=y -CONFIG_FLASH_UNLOCK=y -CONFIG_FLASH_ERASEALL=y -CONFIG_IONICE=y -CONFIG_INOTIFYD=y +# CONFIG_FLASHCP is not set +# CONFIG_FLASH_LOCK is not set +# CONFIG_FLASH_UNLOCK is not set +# CONFIG_FLASH_ERASEALL is not set +# CONFIG_IONICE is not s +# CONFIG_INOTIFYD is not set -CONFIG_READAHEAD=y +# CONFIG_READAHEAD is not set -CONFIG_TASKSET=y -CONFIG_FEATURE_TASKSET_FANCY=y +# CONFIG_TASKSET is not set +# CONFIG_FEATURE_TASKSET_FANCY is not set -CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y +# CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set -CONFIG_IFENSLAVE=y +# CONFIG_IFENSLAVE is not set and it builds. I did not look closely why they fail. I'd hazard to guess that they need new types/constants or kernel headers in RH9 might be a bit broken (e.g. etx2-related things). -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
