On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As for Config.in, >>> I don't think you need to care about those "depends on !MINGW32" (or >>> alike) lines. If it's really a problem, do you have any suggestions? >> >> Yeah, ship a windows defconfig file in the win32 subdirectory that's your >> equivalent of "allyesconfig". > > I'm OK with that too. Denys, should I go with this approach?
Yes. That's how NOMMU support was improved. I kept TODO_config_nommu file in the busybox tree where I documented the fullest .config which builds on NOMMU. You can do the same: add minimal number of WIN workarounds so that allnoconfig builds, add MAX_WIN_config file which documents this. That would be a good start. Then try to add, say, true and false applets... then basename, echo, etc. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
