On Thursday 16 September 2010 17:46, Harald Becker wrote: > Hi! > > On installation busybox creates either hardlinks for every applet or a > separate symlink for each applet, which means you you use around 200 > symlinks = inodes for this. Why don't you create a single symlink > pointing to the absolute path of busybox and do hardlinks to the symlink > for the remaining applets? Would be fine if busybox could install it in > this way. You get the advantage of both types of linking. Flexibility > (you can just replace your binary without reinstalling links) and space > saving on filesystem (needs just 2 inodes, one for the binary and one > for the symlink). > > Comments?
You are free to create hard- or symlinks, or a combination of them as you please, no one says you must use "busybox --install". -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
