On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:10:04PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On installation busybox creates either hardlinks for every applet or a > > separate symlink for each applet, which means you you use around 200 > > symlinks = inodes for this. Why don't you create a single symlink > > pointing to the absolute path of busybox and do hardlinks to the symlink > > for the remaining applets? Would be fine if busybox could install it in > > this way. You get the advantage of both types of linking. Flexibility > > (you can just replace your binary without reinstalling links) and space > > saving on filesystem (needs just 2 inodes, one for the binary and one > > for the symlink). > > You are free to create hard- or symlinks, or a combination of them > as you please, no one says you must use "busybox --install".
"busybox --list" and "busybox --list-path" even makes this easy. >>> Dan _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
