Hallo Harald, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:53:38PM +0200, Harald Becker wrote: > Hallo Wolfgang! > > > As Daniel already mentioned, this does not look correct, either > > ./bin/busybox or /bin/busybox > > ./bin/busybox is a correct symlink but fails on initramfs boot (on some > kernels at least). I know it is a bug, but with the symlink > "/bin/busybox" the boot should succeed.
ok, did not stumble over this yet, probably because I am more a fan of absolute paths anyways. ;-) I was more concerned about the ".." portion in the initial listing. Good to know, though... Thank you, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
