Hallo Wolfgang! > >> ./bin/busybox is a correct symlink but fails on initramfs boot (on some >> kernels at least). I know it is a bug, but with the symlink >> "/bin/busybox" the boot should succeed. > ok, did not stumble over this yet, probably because I am more a fan of > absolute paths anyways. ;-)
Thats me too. I do know that only from a failure of a friend (I had to solve). > I was more concerned about the ".." portion in the initial listing. ../bin/busybox is a correct symlink, as . and .. in the root directory always point to the root directory itself. But initramfs boot fails, with exactly those error messages (seen on x86, x86_64 and ARM architectures). -- Harald _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
