Il giorno mar 14 set 2021 alle ore 18:01 Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > On 14/09/2021 11:24, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:04 AM Roberto A. Foglietta > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Il giorno dom 12 set 2021 alle ore 18:55 Roberto A. Foglietta > >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> > >>> I am going to replace every raise_exception(EXEXIT) with exitshell() > >>> and to remove the EXEXIT altogether. > > > > There is only one: in exitcmd(), the nadler of "exit" builtin. > > > >> It seems to me that EXEXIT does > >>> not add any value but complicates things. What's your opinion on that? > >>> Do you see any possible regression? > > > > Could work. Can you make this change through dash? > > I do not want to diverge here. > > If you change exitcmd() to no longer unwind before calling an EXIT > handler, this will change the behaviour of EXIT handlers in that they > will run in a different environment than before the change. Whether that > is good or bad is arguable and something I do not want to get into, but > it should be clear that this is not some NFC code cleanup, this will > have an impact on how the shell behaves. >
Sorry Harald, I did not got this. There is "nothing" after EXIT: exit terminates the shell execution. So, what kind of environment will be changed between the two ways? -- Roberto A. Foglietta +39.349.33.30.697 _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
