Il mar 14 set 2021, 20:14 Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> On 14/09/2021 19:01, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > I got what you are saying. The unwind means the code executed after > > setjmp returns true and that's the enviroment. > > > > It Is useless to unwind. Nothing significative is done by unwind which > > means nothing that is useful for exiting. Unwind means restore > > variabiles values and free some of them buy nothig that brings any > > value. It Is opposite: the values that are needed for traps are those > > before the unwind. > > I previously wrote: > > > Whether that is good or bad is arguable and something I do not want to > get into > > I stand by that, that is not something I want to get into. > > All I want to say on that is that if you think that is a change for the > better, I think you should present it as such and demonstrate, ideally > with examples, what changes and why you think that change is good, > rather than just present it as a code cleanup. > I got your point. The cleaning activities cited are not included in this patch and in the one we are working for FUNCNAME. The cleaning is referred to an activity to after having replaced all EXEXIT EXEND exceptions. Then all the code related to these two could be removed. After that we will need to involve the dash developing team to start a synchronisation activity to avoid that busybox ash and dash diverges too much and in significative way. >
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
