> > 3. Is anyone interested in using slf4j instead of commons-logging? >
I am. At the moment I'm using a config similar to the one described here: http://blog.springsource.com/2009/12/04/logging-dependencies-in-spring/ , which adds a bit of complexity in the pom but works fine. However, if dropping commons-logging (before or after the release) is an option, I volunteer to do the necessary changes in the code to migrate to slf4j. Regards, Carlos
