hi carlos, i won't join the next long discussion about logging frameworks (just because such a discussion won't lead to a solution which works for most users - there are just too many completely different opinions out there).
don't get me wrong - slf4j is a nice framework. in fact my original suggestion was to use it for all myfaces sub-projects. i just provided the result of a lot of very long and detailed discussions in the myfaces community. -> we can benefit from these discussions or we just ignore them. (both cases might lead to additional online and/or offline discussions.) regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/5/24 Carlos Vara <[email protected]> > > there is a jul to slf4j bridge -> users would still have the choice. > > Yep, but if I remember it right, that bridge offers bad performance as > there is no way to re-implement jul classes so it has to translate the > logging messages. > > Log4j and commons logging bridges don't have that problem. > > Regards, > Carlos > > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > 2010/5/24 Donald Woods <[email protected]> > > > > > Moving to the SLF4J API would be nice, in that then users can choose > > > which logger they want - Log4J, Jul, Simple, None, .... > > > > > > But, I see this as a 0.2 improvement and not as a stop-ship requirement > > > for a 0.1-incubating release. > > > > > > > > > -Donald > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/10 4:27 AM, Carlos Vara wrote: > > > >> > > > >> 3. Is anyone interested in using slf4j instead of commons-logging? > > > >> > > > > > > > > I am. At the moment I'm using a config similar to the one described > here: > > > > > http://blog.springsource.com/2009/12/04/logging-dependencies-in-spring/, > > > > which adds a bit of complexity in the pom but works fine. > > > > > > > > However, if dropping commons-logging (before or after the release) is > an > > > > option, I volunteer to do the necessary changes in the code to > migrate to > > > > slf4j. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > >
