Moving to the SLF4J API would be nice, in that then users can choose which logger they want - Log4J, Jul, Simple, None, ....
But, I see this as a 0.2 improvement and not as a stop-ship requirement for a 0.1-incubating release. -Donald On 5/24/10 4:27 AM, Carlos Vara wrote: >> >> 3. Is anyone interested in using slf4j instead of commons-logging? >> > > I am. At the moment I'm using a config similar to the one described here: > http://blog.springsource.com/2009/12/04/logging-dependencies-in-spring/ , > which adds a bit of complexity in the pom but works fine. > > However, if dropping commons-logging (before or after the release) is an > option, I volunteer to do the necessary changes in the code to migrate to > slf4j. > > Regards, > Carlos >
