On May 26, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Carlos Vara wrote: > Hi, > > - does "mvn rat:check" pass on the source >> > > After the problem with javax.validation.spi.ValidationProvider has been > clarified, only bean-infos-json.ftl fails. I'm not familiar with ftl files > so I don't know if they should have the license.
Here are some reasons why a file might not have an apache license header: 1) They are not Apache Licensed (e.g. a BSD license) 2) They syntactically cannot contain a license header 3) They are machine generated > > >> - can you build the source-release.zip and svn tag >> > > Both build OK. > > >> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE >> and DISCLAIMER files >> > > bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip contains all the files. > Produced JARs when installing all have LICENSE and NOTICE files. I think > they don't need the DISCLAIMER one. jar files need the DISCLAIMER, also. --kevan
