DISCLAIMER was in the jars before BVAl-58. I'll fix before creating a RC2. Thanks for catching it.
-Donald On 5/26/10 10:41 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On May 26, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Carlos Vara wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> - does "mvn rat:check" pass on the source >>> >> >> After the problem with javax.validation.spi.ValidationProvider has been >> clarified, only bean-infos-json.ftl fails. I'm not familiar with ftl files >> so I don't know if they should have the license. > > Here are some reasons why a file might not have an apache license header: > > 1) They are not Apache Licensed (e.g. a BSD license) > 2) They syntactically cannot contain a license header > 3) They are machine generated > >> >> >>> - can you build the source-release.zip and svn tag >>> >> >> Both build OK. >> >> >>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE >>> and DISCLAIMER files >>> >> >> bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip contains all the files. >> Produced JARs when installing all have LICENSE and NOTICE files. I think >> they don't need the DISCLAIMER one. > > jar files need the DISCLAIMER, also. > > --kevan >
