Hi folks! 1st: Yes, I'd second that you all do a _very_ good job.
2nd: But we really also need to take care about those nifty little intellectual property rules! I know this just stinks from a technical pov, but it's really important. And since there have been a few problems recently, there is currently high attention on such things. There is currently a discussion over at [email protected] whether we will force rat runs on all incubation projects. So we really should pass rat _automatically_. Best bet is to enable it in our package phase. Also, there is no shame dropping a release! This happens pretty frequently (just look into the [email protected] archive). Usually there are good reasons if someone votes a -1 on a release - and all projects I know just suspend the vote until the vetoing member either got convinced to recall his veto or the problem got resolved. LieGrue, strub --- On Wed, 5/26/10, Carlos Vara <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Carlos Vara <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Bean Validation 0.1-incubating Release Candidate > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 8:45 AM > Hi, > > - does "mvn rat:check" pass on the source > > > > After the problem with > javax.validation.spi.ValidationProvider has been > clarified, only bean-infos-json.ftl fails. I'm not familiar > with ftl files > so I don't know if they should have the license. > > > > - can you build the source-release.zip and svn tag > > > > Both build OK. > > > > - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required > LICENSE, NOTICE > > and DISCLAIMER files > > > > bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip contains all > the files. > Produced JARs when installing all have LICENSE and NOTICE > files. I think > they don't need the DISCLAIMER one. > > > > - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature > verifiable > > > > Verified signature and hashes of zip and pom files. All > OK. > > > > - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on > a public server > > > > It's on svn which is public for reading. > > > > - does the release pass the TCK > > > > Staged release passes incontainer and standalone tests > here. I also checked > with my project, and its test suite runs fine using this > version. > > So, unless "bean-infos-json.ftl" really needs the license > header, +1 > > Good job these lasts days Donald! >
