On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > -0 > reason: the discussion about using slf4j just stopped and we didn't decide > it unanimously (and there was also no official majority vote).
Hi Gerhard, Were there objections raised regarding slf4j? I recall some discussions, but don't recall any major objections. If there weren't objections raised, then why would there be reason for a vote? > in case of an >explicit< discussion about such a basic topic (which results > in a new dependency) it feels wrong to me to just committing it (including > some comments in the jira issue). I'm not sure I understand you correctly. If you are saying that Jira is not the appropriate location for community "discussions", then I would agree with you. It's not uncommon, however, especially in new communities. Certainly a good reminder -- don't treat Jira as a discussion forum. --kevan
