I think we should continue the vote. We can still discuss how to treat logging in the future for the next release.
LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 2/14/11, Gerhard <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Gerhard <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, February 14, 2011, 8:15 PM > hi kevan, > > see the objections mentioned by mark. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > > > > > On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > > > There have been objections. Mainly that a small > lib like bval shouldnt > > bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is > not as good as other > > logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into > just another logging > > framework deathmatch... > > > > > > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to > year, there is hardly a > > technical argument why one should not use it today. > > > > I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I > would call "objections". > > Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are > objections, let's get > > them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the > vote along. > > > > --kevan >
