On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > There have been objections. Mainly that a small lib like bval shouldnt bring > its own log layer along. java.util.logging is not as good as other logging > frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into just another logging framework > deathmatch... > > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to year, there is hardly a > technical argument why one should not use it today.
I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I would call "objections". Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are objections, let's get them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the vote along. --kevan
