A quick web search reveals marine band HT’s are available from both Icom and 
Yaesu.
FCC “requirements” are here: 
http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=licensing&id=ship_stations 
<http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=licensing&id=ship_stations>

Hope this helps. Sorry there is apparently no HT that transmits on both amateur 
and marine VHF bands. Many ham HT’s will receive the marine VHF frequencies.

Jon/KF5TFJ


> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Bill Crowell via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob and the gang,
> 
> The only radio services where the “out of band” or out of certification apply 
> are the MARS and CAP frequencies immediately adjacent to the ham bands. Very 
> special exceptions to the rules.
> 
> When I was active in MARS and CAP, I had modified my TS-430S for “all 
> frequency transmit” - one blocking diode. The diode for “transmit inhibit” 
> was a requirement for certification under Part 97 for Kenwood.
> 
> Having made this change made it technically possible to spin the dial to 
> 27.185 and call “Breaker ONE NINE…”. That doesn’t mean that I actually did it 
> or that I somehow had a CB radio :)
> 
> Many radio services, other than ours, are channelized because the people 
> using the radios are not radio operators. This is especially true for 
> Maritime where even HF frequencies are channelized. I had to memorize some of 
> the frequency charts to get my GMDSS license.
> 
> Whether a Baofeng radio is a good choice for signal cleanliness to meet 
> certification is an entirely different matter...
> 
> 73
> 
> Bill
>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:02 AM, McClure, Rob K <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Bill,
>>  
>> Thanks for the reply. I knew it was a long shot and I think Icom ‘had’ to 
>> quit making that HT for the same reasons due to rule changes although I’m 
>> not sure.  I did find where Yaesu did make one recently (now discontinued) 
>> using the VX-6 or VX-7 framework that did do Aviation and Ham band, but I 
>> could not find the Icom to which I referred. And as you said, I found none 
>> that did 2m ham and maritime.
>>  
>> I was just hoping to encourage this guy to get his license and get him on 
>> the air as he has other friends besides myself that are hams and he thought 
>> if he could kill two birds with one stone, he would get to the training 
>> quicker.
>>  
>> 73, Rob, KC5RET
>>  
>> Rob McClure
>> Cameron IT Staff
>> Server Operations
>>  
>> From: Bill Crowell [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] 
>> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 9:15 AM
>> To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
>> Cc: McClure, Rob K
>> Subject: Re: [BVARC] 2m and maritime in the same box?
>>  
>> Rob,
>>  
>> I don’t think such an animal exists because of differing certifications.
>>  
>> Ham Radio gear must be certified under part 97 of FCC rules.
>> Maritime is under part 80.
>> Also, maritime VHF is channelized whereas we use frequencies. For example, 
>> every VHF marine radio must operate on channel 16 - bridge-to-bridge simplex.
>>  
>> Though it may be possible to use a ham rig to operate on the same 
>> frequencies as marine, it may NOT be the only radio or the primary radio on 
>> the vessel or harbor station for reasons of both type certification and 
>> compliance with FCC rules and GMDSS regulations. When the Coast Guard pulls 
>> you over and looks, they want to see a certified radio and it operating on 
>> channel 16. <grin>
>>  
>> 73.
>>  
>> N4HPG
>> Amateur Extra
>> GROL
>> 2nd Class Telegraph
>> GMDSS operator/maintainer
>>  
>>  
>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 8:58 AM, McClure, Rob K via BVARC <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>  
>> Hello all,
>>  
>> A coworker here at Cameron has expressed an interest in ham radio. I’m going 
>> to help out as much as I can, and point him in what I think is the right 
>> direction.
>>  
>> He did have an interesting question. He assumed that my Yaesu FT-60 could 
>> communicate on the maritime band. I told him know, but I thought he might be 
>> able to monitor it them. I did a little checking and as I thought, the 
>> Maritime VHF band is higher than the ham band, but it didn’t say if it was 
>> AM, FM, SSB or digital.
>>  
>> Which brings me to his question.  He wanted to know if anyone makes a 
>> 2m/Maritime HT or mobile rig.  I thought this might be possible since Icom 
>> used to make a 2m/Aviation HT for a while with an option I believe for a DF 
>> using what I think are called VOR.
>>  
>> So does anyone know if any one makes or have made (so I might find it at a 
>> ham fest) a 2m/maritime HT or mobile size rig?
>>  
>> 73 all, Rob, KC5RET
>>  
>> Rob McClure
>> Cameron IT Staff
>> Server Operations
>>  
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
>> contain confidential and privileged information of Cameron and its Operating 
>> Divisions. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not 
>> the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete 
>> and destroy all copies of the original message inclusive of any attachments.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> _______________________________________________
>> BVARC mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org 
>> <http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org>
>>  
>> Bill Crowell
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> 
>> <image001.jpg>
>>  
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
>> contain confidential and privileged information of Cameron and its Operating 
>> Divisions. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not 
>> the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete 
>> and destroy all copies of the original message inclusive of any attachments.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 
> 
> Bill Crowell
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <krtek_and_friends.jpg>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org 
> <http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org>
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to