Radar the weather dog......

Dwayne
KB5YTA

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Rick Hiller via BVARC <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Wow….all of these numbers, specifications, ratings, part this and part
> that, are all so confusing and over whelming and make me pine for a more
> simplistic thread about a W3-land weather gopher……what was his name?
> Pittsburgh Pete?   Or something like that……. J W5RH
>
>
>
> *From:* BVARC [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike
> Hardwick via BVARC
> *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 3:57 PM
> *To:* 'BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB' <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Mike Hardwick <[email protected]>; 'Bill Crowell' <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] 2m and maritime in the same box?
>
>
>
> Actually there is one radio that is type certified/accepted/approved for
> both marine and  business band usage (CFR 47 Part 80 marine and part 90).
> It is an ICOM IC-M88 and it has all the VHF-FM marine channels as well as
> the capability of programming up to 22 commercial channels/frequencies in
> it between 146 and 174 MHz. The 22 channels can be either narrowband or
> wideband and has the capability for CTCSS and DCS. Since Part 90 equipment
> is allowed in amateur service, then this radio does cover both marine and
> amateur services legally.
>
>
>
> However using it as an amateur radio would be limiting for several reasons;
>
>
>
> 1.      It cannot be programmed from the front panel at all. You have to
> use software and a special cable for programming.
>
> 2.      It is limited to 22 extra channels/frequency pairs.
>
> 3.      It only covers the upper 2 MHz of the 2 meter band. No mods for
> the other 2 MHz.
>
> 4.      It costs between $250 and $300 which is the cost of at least 7
> Baofengs (is this the Baofeng factor?) In fact, you could buy a couple of
> Baofengs ($70) and a marine handheld ($80) and a marine base station ($100)
> for the cost of one M88
>
>
>
> The best bet for a marine radio is a marine radio and a ham radio for
> amateur use. Use the right radio for the radio service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There are a couple of other radios that are type
> certified/accepted/approved for marine and business band which should cover
> amateur service but I do not think anybody would be interested in them.
>
>
>
> 1.      Harris PRC-152                   Wide-band 30-520 MHz, 762-870
> MHz, AM, WFM, NFM, PSK, CPM, FSK, P25P1, DES encryption,
> ?
> $9999?
>
> 2.      Harris Unity XG-100P      quad-band handheld radio with blue
> tooth, GPS, 12,500 channel capacity, P25 digital format, DES encryption,
> etc.                       $5500
>
> 3.      Motorola APX 7000         tri-band handheld radio with blue
> tooth, more or less the same as above
>
>                                 $6995
>
> 4.      Motorola APX 8000         quad-band handheld radio with blue
> tooth, again the same as above
>
>                                 $7995
>
>
>
> I’m sure everyone will run out and buy two or three of these handheld
> radios.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
> N5VCX
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* BVARC [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jon Noxon via BVARC
> *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 11:01 AM
> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
> *Cc:* Jon Noxon; Bill Crowell
> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] 2m and maritime in the same box?
>
>
>
> A quick web search reveals marine band HT’s are available from both Icom
> and Yaesu.
>
> FCC “requirements” are here:
> http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=licensing&id=ship_stations
>
>
>
> Hope this helps. Sorry there is apparently no HT that transmits on both
> amateur and marine VHF bands. Many ham HT’s will receive the marine VHF
> frequencies.
>
>
>
> Jon/KF5TFJ
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Bill Crowell via BVARC <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Rob and the gang,
>
>
>
> The only radio services where the “out of band” or out of certification
> apply are the MARS and CAP frequencies immediately adjacent to the ham
> bands. Very special exceptions to the rules.
>
>
>
> When I was active in MARS and CAP, I had modified my TS-430S for “all
> frequency transmit” - one blocking diode. The diode for “transmit inhibit”
> was a requirement for certification under Part 97 for Kenwood.
>
>
>
> Having made this change made it technically possible to spin the dial to
> 27.185 and call “Breaker ONE NINE…”. That doesn’t mean that I actually did
> it or that I somehow had a CB radio :)
>
>
>
> Many radio services, other than ours, are channelized because the people
> using the radios are not radio operators. This is especially true for
> Maritime where even HF frequencies are channelized. I had to memorize some
> of the frequency charts to get my GMDSS license.
>
>
>
> Whether a Baofeng radio is a good choice for signal cleanliness to meet
> certification is an entirely different matter...
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Bill
>
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:02 AM, McClure, Rob K <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello Bill,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. I knew it was a long shot and I think Icom ‘had’ to
> quit making that HT for the same reasons due to rule changes although I’m
> not sure.  I did find where Yaesu did make one recently (now discontinued)
> using the VX-6 or VX-7 framework that did do Aviation and Ham band, but I
> could not find the Icom to which I referred. And as you said, I found none
> that did 2m ham and maritime.
>
>
>
> I was just hoping to encourage this guy to get his license and get him on
> the air as he has other friends besides myself that are hams and he thought
> if he could kill two birds with one stone, he would get to the training
> quicker.
>
>
>
> 73, Rob, KC5RET
>
>
>
> Rob McClure
>
> Cameron IT Staff
>
> Server Operations
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill Crowell [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 9:15 AM
> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
> *Cc:* McClure, Rob K
> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] 2m and maritime in the same box?
>
>
>
> Rob,
>
>
>
> I don’t think such an animal exists because of differing certifications.
>
>
>
> Ham Radio gear must be certified under part 97 of FCC rules.
>
> Maritime is under part 80.
>
> Also, maritime VHF is channelized whereas we use frequencies. For example,
> every VHF marine radio must operate on channel 16 - bridge-to-bridge
> simplex.
>
>
>
> Though it may be possible to use a ham rig to operate on the same
> frequencies as marine, it may NOT be the only radio or the primary radio on
> the vessel or harbor station for reasons of both type certification and
> compliance with FCC rules and GMDSS regulations. When the Coast Guard pulls
> you over and looks, they want to see a certified radio and it operating on
> channel 16. <grin>
>
>
>
> 73.
>
>
>
> N4HPG
>
> Amateur Extra
>
> GROL
>
> 2nd Class Telegraph
>
> GMDSS operator/maintainer
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 8:58 AM, McClure, Rob K via BVARC <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> A coworker here at Cameron has expressed an interest in ham radio. I’m
> going to help out as much as I can, and point him in what I think is the
> right direction.
>
>
>
> He did have an interesting question. He assumed that my Yaesu FT-60 could
> communicate on the maritime band. I told him know, but I thought he might
> be able to monitor it them. I did a little checking and as I thought, the
> Maritime VHF band is higher than the ham band, but it didn’t say if it was
> AM, FM, SSB or digital.
>
>
>
> Which brings me to his question.  He wanted to know if anyone makes a
> 2m/Maritime HT or mobile rig.  I thought this might be possible since Icom
> used to make a 2m/Aviation HT for a while with an option I believe for a DF
> using what I think are called VOR.
>
>
>
> So does anyone know if any one makes or have made (so I might find it at a
> ham fest) a 2m/maritime HT or mobile size rig?
>
>
>
> 73 all, Rob, KC5RET
>
>
>
> Rob McClure
>
> Cameron IT Staff
>
> Server Operations
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential and privileged information of Cameron and its
> Operating Divisions. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> email and delete and destroy all copies of the original message inclusive
> of any attachments.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
>
> Bill Crowell
>
> [email protected]
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential and privileged information of Cameron and its
> Operating Divisions. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> email and delete and destroy all copies of the original message inclusive
> of any attachments.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> Bill Crowell
>
> [email protected]
>
>
> <krtek_and_friends.jpg>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to