I passed Tech and General the same day by cramming on the Internet for the 
exams. I don't have an HR radio yet, and have never worked HF. Not entirely 
sure I will, though I will probably take the Extra just to do it...

I still don't know Jack about ham radio, but I'm careful enough not to try to 
step on too many toes. I think it'll likely be a good thing for the hobby if it 
gets more ppl into it. I'm not sure many younger folks find it as relevant as 
it once was...


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device


-------- Original message --------
From: Travis Burgess via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
Date: 2/28/18 4:39 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org>
Cc: Travis Burgess <k5...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [BVARC] [tdxs-list] Expanding Privileges to End Amateur Radio


As a no code general, I must fall into that invader category too.


K5HTB


________________________________
From: BVARC <bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org> on behalf of Paul Noll via BVARC 
<bvarc@bvarc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 4:17 PM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
Cc: Paul Noll
Subject: Re: [BVARC] [tdxs-list] Expanding Privileges to End Amateur Radio

Wow, you sound like the technicians are  invading "your" territory. You also 
sound like you have a problem with those who got their start in the CB bands 
over 30 years ago, like me. If the FCC makes this change then those bands would 
no longer be just "general band" anymore. I'm just a "TECHNICIAN" and have been 
for almost two years and can say that the changes will not stop me from getting 
my general but will get me experience in the bands before I leap off into the 
fray. I don't think it will cause any more problems than all ready exists.  
Enforcement of current rules is what is needed, not holding operators back 
because a few have no respect for the rules.. If you want amateur radio to grow 
and not continue it's decline among younger operators then more operators need 
to get with the program and welcome changes that hopefully will do just that. 
It's not your bands, it's our bands and I respectfully disagree  with your 
statement.

Paul

On Feb 28, 2018 15:30, "gmuller885--- via BVARC" 
<bvarc@bvarc.org<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org>> wrote:
To All
  I concur with Gary. We can not control the Techs that have invaded the 
General bad as it is.

Gerald Muller K9GEM
gmuller...@aol.com<mailto:gmuller...@aol.com>
In a message dated 2/28/2018 2:59:48 PM Central Standard Time, 
tdxs-l...@tdxs.net<mailto:tdxs-l...@tdxs.net> writes:

I say no.  The Technician class in an entry point.  If you have General class 
privileges on HF there is no intensive to continue learning about Amateur 
Radio.  The Technician class is already inundated with with poor operators from 
the old Citizen Band radio service.  Many of these operators need to be policed 
into better operating procedures but there there does not seem to be any 
recourse to do so.   Allow these operators to flood over into the General Class 
operating prividlges will spell the end to Amateur Radio and doom our remaining 
bands to the same QRM as the old Citizen Band.

ARRL Requests Expanded HF Privileges for Technician 
Licensees<http://www.arrl.org/news/view/arrl-requests-expanded-hf-privileges-for-technician-licensees>


ARRL Requests Expanded HF Privileges for Technician Licensees
The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) is the national association for amateur 
radio, connecting hams around the...





The above is solely my opinion and does not represent that of the Texas DX 
Society or any of it's members.


Gary D. Antley
Possum Walk Texas
DE KI5LR

“It is better to have enemies than friends.   At least you know they are out to 
get you.”  Gary David Antley
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.tdxs.net/mailman/options/tdxs-list/gmuller885%40aol.com

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org>
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to pbn...@gmail.com<mailto:pbn...@gmail.com>


_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to