I’m new to this game, but as far as I am aware, the FCC does very little to 
support amateur radio, with the exception of allowing hams to use certain 
frequencies. This would appear to be nothing more than a money grab, having 
nothing to do with cost of administration, (since it sounds like most of the 
administration is automated). They certainly contribute very little to 
enforcing their own rules. I don’t mind paying for a toll road if I’m a user, 
but a toll road requires constant upkeep and upgrades. I don’t see the parallel 
to amateur radio. I hope the ARRL gathers its forces against this proposal (to 
the extent that its bylaws allow) and supports all ancillary efforts to kill 
this effort. That’s just my initial thought on the matter. Tell me why I’m 
wrong.

 

73, K5JPP, JP

 

 

 

from: BVARC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of john Parmalee via BVARC
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 2:27 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Cc: john Parmalee <[email protected]>
Subject: [BVARC] FCC Proposes to Reinstate Amateur Radio Service Fees

 


FCC Proposes to Reinstate Amateur Radio Service Fees


08/28/2020

Amateur radio licensees would pay a $50 fee for each amateur radio license 
application if the FCC adopts rules it proposed this week. Included in the 
FCC’s fee proposal are applications for new licenses, renewal and upgrades to 
existing licenses, and vanity call sign requests. Excluded are applications for 
administrative updates, such as changes of address, and annual regulatory fees.

The FCC proposal is contained in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ( 
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-116A1.pdf> NPRM) in MD Docket 
20-270, which was adopted to implement portions of the “Repack Airwaves 
Yielding Better Access for Users of Modern Services Act” of 2018 — the 
so-called “ <https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ141/PLAW-115publ141.pdf> 
Ray Baum’s Act.”

The Act requires that the FCC switch from a Congressionally-mandated fee 
structure to a cost-based system of assessment. In its NPRM, the FCC proposed 
application fees for a broad range of services that use the FCC’s Universal 
Licensing System (ULS), including the Amateur Radio Service that had been 
excluded by an earlier statute. The 2018 statute excludes the Amateur Service 
from annual regulatory fees, but not from application fees.

“[A]pplications for personal licenses are mostly automated and do not have 
individualized staff costs for data input or review,” the FCC said in its NPRM. 
“For these automated processes — new/major modifications, renewal, and minor 
modifications — we propose a nominal application fee of $50 due to automating 
the processes, routine ULS maintenance, and limited instances where staff input 
is required.”

The same $50 fee would apply to all Amateur Service applications, including 
those for vanity call signs. “Although there is currently no fee for vanity 
call signs in the Amateur Radio Service, we find that such applications impose 
similar costs in aggregate on Commission resources as new applications and 
therefore propose a $50 fee,” the FCC said.

The FCC is not proposing to charge for administrative updates, such as mailing 
address changes for amateur applications, and amateur radio will remain exempt 
from annual regulatory fees. “For administrative updates [and] modifications, 
which also are highly automated, we find that it is in the public interest to 
encourage licensees to update their [own] information without a charge,” the 
FCC said.

The FCC also proposes to assess a $50 fee for individuals who want a printed 
copy of their license. “The Commission has proposed to eliminate these services 
— but to the extent the Commission does not do so, we propose a fee of $50 to 
cover the costs of these services,” the FCC said.

The Ray Baum’s Act does not exempt filing fees in the Amateur Radio Service. 
The FCC dropped assessment of fees for vanity call signs several years ago.

Deadlines for comments and reply comments will be determined once the NPRM 
appears in the Federal Register. File comments by using the FCC’s Electronic 
Comment Filing System ( <https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings> ECFS), posting to MD 
Docket No. 20-270. This docket is already open for accepting comments even 
though deadlines have not yet been set.

________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to