Thanks Robert!  I especially like using your call sign instead of "comment"

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:49 PM Jeffery MacMillian via BVARC <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks Robert. Very clear and well stated.......
>
> Have Fun,
> Jeff
> KC5TT
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:45 PM Robert Polinski via BVARC <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> As the 94 trustee I am going to give a quick statement.
>>
>>     I did not hear the net so I cannot comment on what was or was not
>> said. The rules on the 94 (and most other repeaters) are
>>
>>    1. That it is not a closed repeater, every ham is welcome. If you
>>    want to have a private chat were outside opinions or involvement is
>>
>> not wanted, that’s what a cell phone is good for!
>>
>>    1. Please, please let the repeater drop and count to 3 to allow
>>    anyone else to join. If you are trying to not let them in, go back to 1.
>>    2. Be respectful to all other hams, If you don’t want to talk to
>>    them, just say you reached you stop, or the xyl calling and sign off.
>>    3. New hams take priority. I would advise all nets, make a special
>>    call for new hams. At the speed us OM are becoming SK, we need them.
>>
>> We did this when we met at meetings an should do this at nets, all nets,
>> BVARC,ARES, or any other nets, If clubs & groups want new blood, this is a
>> must. A net is many new hams first contact.
>>
>>    1. As far as the break-in using the word COMMENT, Although it is not
>>    bad, I think it is better for operators to just put their call sign. This
>>    is
>>
>> the proper way to break in and what the ARRL teaches.
>>
>>
>>    1. In the years I have been trustee, I had to tell only one ham that
>>    he could not use the 94. He was advertising a web page for the KKK using
>>
>> another hams call. And as trustee I do have that right.
>>
>>    1. Just like children, new learn from old. If you exhibit poor
>>    operating habits , the new one will copy.
>>    2. I have witnessed some older club members, not being too welcoming
>>    to newbies, I am sure I have a time or to, so have I. Lets try not to do
>>    this. Just maybe a bad day, or bad time, but you can have a lasting impact
>>    on a new ham.
>>    3. I am blessed to know many of you fellow hams and hope to meet the
>>    new hams. At a time that many of my great ham friends have become SK, we
>>    need to be grateful for the people around us. Always have fun and go not
>>    let anyone steal your joy.
>>
>>                                                      Robert Polinski
>> KD5YVQ  Trustee of the 146.940 KG5EEO repeater
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* BVARC <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *rodney martinez
>> via BVARC
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 04, 2021 7:21 PM
>> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* rodney martinez <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] Net problems
>>
>>
>>
>> Rodney (NK5Q) here.
>>
>>
>>
>> Everybody, I want to apologize for posting the first email about Monday's
>> Net Control.  I had no idea it would explode into the sh*tstorm it has
>> become, and unrelated issues as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> I just had to speak my mind on how Net was disallowing check-ins without
>> traffic to report.  My bad apparently.
>>
>>
>>
>> I promised Mike Hardwick I would not beat this horse to death after that
>> first and only email.  I keep getting requests from members for more info
>> about Monday Net.  I have kept pretty much silent.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please kindly do not continue to ask me.  I appreciate your concerns, but
>> BOD will handle it from here.  They will handle it during next meeting.
>> Thank you for your interest, but I don't want to build a divide in our club.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Rod
>>
>> NK5Q
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 17:15, mark janzer via BVARC
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>
>> BVARC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are available here: 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/%20>
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>
>> BVARC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are available here:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 

Reply via email to