CW is carrier on/off sending Morse code MCW is tone modulation on /off ..  
carrier stays onChris WB5ITT Sent via my Samsung Galaxy S10e, an AT&T 5G 
Evolution capable smartphone..so there! 😂
-------- Original message --------From: Mike Knerr via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
Date: 6/18/23  9:14 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
<bvarc@bvarc.org> Cc: Mike Knerr <mike5586m...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [BVARC] 
146.940 Repeater Problems and Repeater Operation Thank you,So am I correct in 
CW is turning off and on an audio tone, and MCW is turning off and on the FM 
frequency?Mike Knerr KI5UBL 73PS. Happy Father's Day to everyone.On Sun, Jun 
18, 2023, 9:02 AM wb5itt via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:CW is allowed 
anywhere under the frequency limits of the operator license....what was being 
transmitted via the repeater was MCW, a tone modulating the FM carrier...legal 
only in phone bands above 29.5 MHz..a tone fed into a SSB transmitter is 
considered A1A or true CW, not MCW which is A2 or F2 depending on modulation 
method.only two segments, 50.0-50.1 and 144.0 - 144.1 are CW only....you can 
find it online at several places ...Google FCC Part 97Chris WB5ITT Sent via my 
Samsung Galaxy S10e, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone..so there! 
😂-------- Original message --------From: Mike Knerr via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
Date: 6/18/23  8:46 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
<bvarc@bvarc.org> Cc: Mike Knerr <mike5586m...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [BVARC] 
146.940 Repeater Problems and Repeater Operation I'm still new at this, is CW 
allowed on 2 meters?On Sat, Jun 17, 2023, 6:52 PM Suggs, Marvin (KTRK-TV) via 
BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:




Did they find out who was sending CW over the 146.94 machine a week ago Friday?
Marvin
N5RKW 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 17, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Eddie Runner via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:






This Message is From an External Sender
Caution: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender 
and know the content is safe.





When something like this happens its pretty simple for EVERYONE to monitor
the 146.34 input to the repeater and forward signal reports.. Most folks have a 
rev
button... this is what its for.   


Last night Suzanne (KF5GWZ) and I set out to find the problem
and we did.


We had a few previous reports (Guesses??) like Mike forwarded, but that 
didn't match the results Suzanne and I were getting.. I think the area 
that was under suspicion WAS NOT the area we went to... All those calls 
would have been a waste..


We used the signal strength meter on a mobile rig (icom r7000) and a 
handheld with a signal strength meter as well, monitoring 146.34.


Took a little over an hour then after it was fixed,
we stopped and had some good tx mex for dinner..


It was a fun Friday Date night..  ha ha
Wish more folks were out there to join us, we had a blast..


Eddie (NU5K)
PS - good subject for future BVARC training...





On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 02:07:05 PM CDT, John Denison via BVARC 
<bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:







I'm glad this issue was resolved, and for what its worth, there are at least 50 
hams in the area which would have made it time consuming to contact each one. 
This was a good (not good) unplanned fox hunt, and it reminds me of the time 
there was interference
 on the 146.92 repeater years ago. At the time I had an Icom mobile which had 
an attenuator on the squelch control, so it was relatively easy to narrow the 
signal down to a few square blocks.


This is one of the things I like about ham radio the most... hams coming 
together to offer a service or resolve an issue.

73
John Denison
KD5YOU











________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyjuqEIKKA$

Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyhCgqte1Q$
  





________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to