That "day" of transmissions sounded more like a recording of morse code being played every minute. Some radios have a feature that will allow the operator to record him or herself and play it back repeatedly as in calling CQ or QRZ. I've heard its use on Field Day as well as in some YouTube videos.

73
John Denison
KD5YOU

On 6/18/2023 9:01 AM, wb5itt via BVARC wrote:
CW is allowed anywhere under the frequency limits of the operator license....what was being transmitted via the repeater was MCW, a tone modulating the FM carrier...legal only in phone bands above 29.5 MHz..a tone fed into a SSB transmitter is considered A1A or true CW, not MCW which is A2 or F2 depending on modulation method.

only two segments, 50.0-50.1 and 144.0 - 144.1 are CW only....you can find it online at several places ...Google FCC Part 97

Chris WB5ITT



Sent via my Samsung Galaxy S10e, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone..so there! 😂


-------- Original message --------
From: Mike Knerr via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
Date: 6/18/23 8:46 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org>
Cc: Mike Knerr <mike5586m...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BVARC] 146.940 Repeater Problems and Repeater Operation

I'm still new at this, is CW allowed on 2 meters?

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023, 6:52 PM Suggs, Marvin (KTRK-TV) via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

    Did they find out who was sending CW over the 146.94 machine a
    week ago Friday?
    Marvin
    N5RKW

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Jun 17, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Eddie Runner via BVARC
    <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

    

    *This Message is From an External Sender*
    Caution: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
    recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

    When something like this happens its pretty simple for EVERYONE
    to monitor
    the 146.34 input to the repeater and forward signal reports..
    Most folks have a rev
    button... this is what its for.

    Last night Suzanne (KF5GWZ) and I set out to find the problem
    *and we did*.

    We had a few previous reports (Guesses??) like Mike forwarded,
    but that
    didn't match the results Suzanne and I were getting.. I think the
    area
    that was under suspicion WAS NOT the area we went to... All those
    calls
    would have been a waste..

    We used the signal strength meter on a mobile rig (icom r7000) and a
    handheld with a signal strength meter as well, monitoring 146.34.

    Took a little over an hour then after it was fixed,
    we stopped and had some good tx mex for dinner..

    It was a fun Friday Date night.. ha ha
    Wish more folks were out there to join us, we had a blast..

    Eddie (NU5K)
    PS - good subject for future BVARC training...

    On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 02:07:05 PM CDT, John Denison via
    BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:


    I'm glad this issue was resolved, and for what its worth, there
    are at least 50 hams in the area which would have made it time
    consuming to contact each one. This was a good (not good)
    unplanned fox hunt, and it reminds me of the time there was
    interference on the 146.92 repeater years ago. At the time I had
    an Icom mobile which had an attenuator on the squelch control, so
    it was relatively easy to narrow the signal down to a few square
    blocks.

    This is one of the things I like about ham radio the most... hams
    coming together to offer a service or resolve an issue.

    73
    John Denison
    KD5YOU


    ________________________________________________
    Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

    BVARC mailing list
    BVARC@bvarc.org
    
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyjuqEIKKA$

    Publicly available archives are available here:
    
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyhCgqte1Q$

    ________________________________________________
    Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

    BVARC mailing list
    BVARC@bvarc.org
    http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
    Publicly available archives are available here:
    https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/


________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here:https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to