"I woud let the existing set of tools mature a bit and concentrate on getting people to use them effecdtively (perhaps consolidate their functionality) before introducing any more."
That sounds like a very good idea. It would probably be a good idea to do the same thing with DNS records and servers. --- In [email protected], "Robert S. DeLorey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Sean Burns <sean.burns@> wrote: > > > > On the staff list one of the Board members mentioned how it was > > difficult to keep track of all the online forms of communication > > we use. Robert suggested we move this to the shop list to > > discuss. He composed a list at the following URL: > > > > http://wiki.bworks.org/doku.php/robert_citek#external_links > > > > We have 16 different websites. Each serves a different function. > > Some of the stuff, like the pbwiki, mostly serves as an archive > > site now, but most others are actively used or are setup for > > future expansion (like flikr). > > > > What do others think? Is there something we should do about this > > or is it fine or ... ? > > > > Thanks, > > IMHO - I agree with Susan. I have a pretty strong technical > background but I can't (don't have time to) keep up with the > proliferation of communication tools that are being implemented. > I get each posting to the staff list as they are generated. I go to > the shop list when I have time and check the message list there. > I have looked at the material on the Wiki, and see where it has a use > as an internal training tool. I also have tried to use Google.Docs as > a collaborative tool for developing the Strategic Plan > (disappointing). > In addition to all this, I maintain several mailing lists on my own > computer for communicating with specific groups within BWorks such as > all Volunteers, Board Members only, BikeWORKS voluinteers only, > ByteWORKS volunteers only and Prospective vounteers, donors, etc. > I woud let the existing set of tools mature a bit and concentrate on > getting people to use them effecdtively (perhaps consolidate their > functionality) before introducing any more. > > Steve > > > sean > > > > -- > > Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:58:13 -0500 > > >
