Relative capability, language and version number questions
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1552
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Improvement
Components: Miscellaneous
Versions: 2.7.0
Environment: Solaris
Reporter: David G. Pickett
Priority: Minor
We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the
level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is the
real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the version
numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are the
product actually verey comparable?
The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy
support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do
not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit
challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the
JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know
version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
