[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=all ] David Bertoni closed XERCESC-1552: ----------------------------------
> Relative capability, language and version number questions > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: XERCESC-1552 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552 > Project: Xerces-C++ > Type: Improvement > Components: Miscellaneous > Versions: 2.7.0 > Environment: Solaris > Reporter: David G. Pickett > Priority: Minor > > We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the > level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is > the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the > version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are > the product actually verey comparable? > The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy > support, or are there other virtues to the low number? > It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do > not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit > challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions? > Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the > JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know > version? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
