[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=all ]
David Bertoni resolved XERCESC-1552:
------------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
> Relative capability, language and version number questions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESC-1552
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
> Project: Xerces-C++
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Versions: 2.7.0
> Environment: Solaris
> Reporter: David G. Pickett
> Priority: Minor
>
> We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the
> level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is
> the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the
> version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are
> the product actually verey comparable?
> The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy
> support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
> It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do
> not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit
> challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
> Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the
> JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know
> version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
