Hi Dave,
the change was intentional; XMLSize_t should be used when dealing
with a number that expresses the size of a memory buffer (i.e. it
complements a pointer), while unsigned int/unsigned long are to be
used when expressing standalone numbers (i.e. the number of items in
a vector/list, the line/column number).
Alberto
At 17.30 23/07/2007 -0700, David Bertoni wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that in many places, unsigned int parameters have been
changed to XMLSize_t. However, there seem to be some places where
that did not happen. For example, the SAX/SAX2 AttributeList and
Attributes classes still use unsigned int, as does DOMNodeList.
Is this intended, or should those classes be updated as well? I
would be happy to fix them up, if necessary.
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
