Hi Justin, Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the powers that be would like me to make these changes and submit a > patch. Thanks for the offer. When I was updating the documentation for 2.8.0, I considered adding a separate section for MinGW, but decided against it because (1) the MinGW-Msys toolchain is very similar to UNIX and (2) I didn't think there are many people using it. Perhaps I should have added it anyway. Now, after 2.8.0 is out, updating the documentation will require some considerations. The major problem is that the documentation is normally updated with the release (the source distribution contains a complete copy of documentation, the same as on the web). The second thing to consider is that the upcoming 3.0.0 release will have a completely different, configure-based build system so the documentation section, at least for UNIX/Cygwin/Mingw, will need to be re-written pretty much from scratch. It is not clear to me that it is a good idea to spend time on writing documentation for MinGW while in a few months most people who are starting to use Xerces-C++ will be using 3.0.0. What do you think? Boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
