Folks,

Question about the build platforms table.

I currently added teo 32 bit windows targets:
MinGW-GCC 3.4.x or later
Cygwin-GCC 3.4.x or later

Is that notation good?

Can someone testify to building with those envirorments using 64 bit
windows? Does the project claim to support those platforms on 64 bit
windows?

Regards,

Justin Dearing

On 10/18/07, Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Justin Dearing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Personally I don't mind making changes that will last a couple of months.
> > Secondly, I think that even if the cygwin and mingw directions were
> > shortened to "see unix directions" in version 3.0, making that explicitly
> > clear, and organizing the documentation as per my suggestions would make
> > everything clear for parties not completely familiar with build systems.
>
> Ok, let's do this. You will need to check out the xerces-2 branch. This
> is a development branch for the 2-series code base:
>
> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xerces/c/branches/xerces-2
>
> The documentation is in the xerces-2/doc/ directory in .xml files.
> To generate actual .html files from these you will need to use the
> generatedocs{.sh,.bat} script in xerces-2/. Note that it needs
> java runtime. The resulting html is placed in xerces-2/doc/html/.
>
> I suggest that you add a section to build-winunix.xml for Mingw. You
> will also need to add a link in build.xml.
>
> Some thought on what would be good to have covered:
>
> - Building using both cygwin (-mno-cygwin) and msys toolchains.
>
> - Note about compiling application code with -DXML_LIBRARY when linking
>   to the static Xerces-C++ library.
>
> - Note about this bug:
>   http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-users&m=118891009725180&w=2
>
> Once you are done, create a Jira issue and attach the patch to it. Make
> sure to grant the rights to ASF when uploading the patch (this way we
> will have a patch sign-off trail). After that I will review & commit
> it and regenerate the web site.
>
>
> > I would like to look over the 3.0 documentation before release and
> > see if there is anything unclear about it.
>
> Thanks, that would be great. We still haven't decided what to do with
> the docs for 3.0.0 and I am sure there will be a discussion on this
> matter here some time soon, so feel free to join in.
>
> Boris
>
> --
> Boris Kolpackov
> Code Synthesis Tools CC
> http://www.codesynthesis.com
> Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to