Hey, On Nov 5, 2007 10:07 PM, Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2007 10:58:33 AM:
> > Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would also like to suggest that we have all the infrastructure > > issues worked out before we commit to migrating to Forrest. > > +1 to that. Hmm.... Sorry, but I'm not clear why this is good. The current website needs unification, and I have offers from at least one individual willing to spend time working on the site. I don't have offers from anyone to help with the auto* issues that are keeping 3.0 from coming out the door. If Forrest is not the site-creation tool that we want to use, that is fine. But to suggest that someone shouldn't work on updating the site because 3.0 isn't ready seems strange. Perhaps i'm missing something. Would someone be willing to clarify? Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
