Boris, On 11/5/07, Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The notation is good. There is another problem however. If we add > these platforms to the "Platforms and Binaries" table then we will > have to build precompiled binaries for them (since the page says > that they are available). This is getting quite a bit more > complicated than simply adding the build instructions. Perhaps we > should add these into the "Other Platforms and Compilers" section > in readme.xml?
I see no good deed goes unpunished. Well what would it take to get binaries distributed? Is it simply a matter of me providing zipped compiled binaries? Or would this require modifications to an official build server? If its simply a matter of me attaching binaries to a jira ticker, and requires no build changes I'll do that. If its more complicated than that I would like to be involved in making thos platforms official for Xerces-3. For the other platforms bullet list, I think its a good idea to make it a table listing both compiler and platform like the supported platforms. For gcc 3.2, we can simply list "Most platforms that have gcc 3.4 support." Does Forrest support macros via entities.dtd? If so I will move that table there. It will be useful for xerces 3. Best regards, Justin Dearing --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
