Mickey Mathieson wrote: > > --- David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mickey Mathieson a écrit : >>> I am new to the group and have noticed a lot of >> questions of >>> recursion. >>> A problem that is suitable for recursion should >> produce a smaller >>> function that if the problem was solved without >> recursion. This has >>> not been the case from the postings that i have >> looked at. >>> I have provided an example of recursion done >> correctly to reverse a >>> string. Notice how short and compact the code is. >> This is the object >>> of recursion - less code at the expense of more >> memory being used. >>> Mickey M. >>> senior software engineer >>> http://www.constructionpartner.com >>> > The second if test is not needed MY MISTAKE!!! > Not paying complete attention. > > If you think you can come up with a BETTER RECUSIVE > SOLUTION lets see it! Otherwise your blowing wind.
Now you have me concerned that a professional app. is being written by someone who isn't even testing simple examples. If you can't be bothered to test the simple examples you write, can you be bothered to thoroughly test your main application? Experience tells me: Probably not. You aren't exactly representing the company you work for very well. BTW, c-prog is Google searchable. You may want to consider using professional language when sending messages to the list when you associate yourself with the company you work for. Your employer (and potential customers!) may also periodically search Google and might come up with this e-mail thread. -- Thomas Hruska CubicleSoft President Ph: 517-803-4197 *NEW* VerifyMyPC 2.2 Change tracking and management tool. Reduce tech. support times from 2 hours to 5 minutes. Free for personal use, $10 otherwise. http://www.CubicleSoft.com/VerifyMyPC/
