> It's up to you whether you focus on that, or your ego. > One of these choices will help you become a better > programmer. ;-) > > > in this case, i was just lost of words..
oops!i think we have some misunderstanding here..what i mean is, i was lost of words to the one who's asking me this, that's why i needed some additional info for explaining what went wrong on the broken code... > It wasn't what you wanted to hear. But I (still) believe > it's what you needed to hear. > my apologies if i was just too focusing on a specific part.. i should be more careful and be elaborate next time > > it was not my problem in the first place... > > somebody had just asked me... > > Now that is not relevant here. The question was asked > and answered. Who asked it isn't important. OPs are not > the sole stakeholder when a question is asked in a forum > of 10000 people, most of whom are newbies. > > > in any case, thanks for the answers =) > > If my post discourages just one person from trying to > learn C by guesswork and broken samples, then it will > be worth it. > > If you want the friendly answer: The code has no well > defined behaviour. So I can't answer why the program > did what it did on your machine. > > But that answer doesn't convey the message that this > sort of examination of C programs is deeply flawed. > > -- > Peter > either way, i do believe i got the answer i should have(and must have) from you guys, my apologies again if i've made some of you got annoyed, esp. for nico. ynth
