--- In [email protected], "int21h_d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > > If you want the friendly answer: The code has no well > > defined behaviour. So I can't answer why the program > > did what it did on your machine. > > > > But that answer doesn't convey the message that this > > sort of examination of C programs is deeply flawed. > > > > -- > > Peter > > > > either way, i do believe i got the answer i should have > (and must have) from you guys, my apologies again if > i've made some of you got annoyed, esp. for nico.
Calm down, that's not what I meant. I'm sorry as well that I misunderstood you, but I didn't feel annoyed, only sorry. Because I had the impression that you simply would not understand what Peter has tried to point out: provoking undefined behaviour in your code might have every imaginable result, seemingly correct output is just as legal as being hijacked to another universe by some kidding alien. I think we've written enough about this topic; we ended up misunderstanding one another regarding our attitudes, we've clarified it, and I suggest we stop it here. O.k.? Regards, Nico
