All, I executed the program on my solaris box and its working as expected.
Snapshot of on output is hello world hello worldthequickbrownfoxjumpsoverthelazydog Thanks, MS On 5/24/07, int21h_d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's up to you whether you focus on that, or your ego. > > One of these choices will help you become a better > > programmer. ;-) > > > > > in this case, i was just lost of words.. > > oops!i think we have some misunderstanding here..what i mean is, i was > lost of words to the one who's asking me this, that's why i needed > some additional info for explaining what went wrong on the broken code... > > > It wasn't what you wanted to hear. But I (still) believe > > it's what you needed to hear. > > > > my apologies if i was just too focusing on a specific part.. i should be > more careful and be elaborate next time > > > > it was not my problem in the first place... > > > somebody had just asked me... > > > > Now that is not relevant here. The question was asked > > and answered. Who asked it isn't important. OPs are not > > the sole stakeholder when a question is asked in a forum > > of 10000 people, most of whom are newbies. > > > > > in any case, thanks for the answers =) > > > > If my post discourages just one person from trying to > > learn C by guesswork and broken samples, then it will > > be worth it. > > > > If you want the friendly answer: The code has no well > > defined behaviour. So I can't answer why the program > > did what it did on your machine. > > > > But that answer doesn't convey the message that this > > sort of examination of C programs is deeply flawed. > > > > -- > > Peter > > > > either way, i do believe i got the answer i should have(and must have) > from you guys, my apologies again if i've made some of you got > annoyed, esp. for nico. > > ynth > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
