At Tuesday 1/8/2008 04:37 PM, you wrote: >"wxDev-C++ which seems to be under active development." > > Agree with that. The good thing about it is > that it lets you develop the visual appearance easily while DevC++ doesn't- >
Okay, thanks guys. I installed Bloodshed DevC++ because it was (one of the compilers) recommended by this list. Perhaps the list should be updated. I'll take a look at wxDev-C++ ~Rick >Brett McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Jan 8, 2008 4:10 PM, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, so i had the same prob using the same compiler. > > > > BTW, you're wrong since there are a lot of updates you can download. > > There's an option that lets you update Dev C++. > >I like the module downloader, although occasionally it bails out -- >usually dependency clashes... but does it actually update the IDE >itself? If there are updates why no updated versions you can download >directly from the Bloodshed website? > >According to the forum on Sourceforge, it doesn't look like Dev-C++ is >undergoing any further development but there were suggestions of using >wxDev-C++ which seems to be under active development. > >-- Brett >---------------------------------------------------------- >"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; >If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." >-- Jelaleddin Rumi > > > > > >--------------------------------- > >Web Revelación Yahoo! 2007: > Premio Favorita del Público - ¡Vota tu preferida! > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >To unsubscribe, send a blank message to ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
