Hmmm... I haven't ever tried wxDev-C++ --- Thomas Hruska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> ~Rick wrote: > > At Tuesday 1/8/2008 04:37 PM, you wrote: > >> "wxDev-C++ which seems to be under active > development." > >> > >> Agree with that. The good thing about it is > >> that it lets you develop the visual appearance > easily while DevC++ doesn't- > >> > > > > Okay, thanks guys. I installed Bloodshed DevC++ > > because it was (one of the compilers) recommended > > by this list. Perhaps the list should be updated. > > > > I'll take a look at wxDev-C++ > > > > ~Rick > > I wasn't aware that Dev-C++ was no longer being > actively developed. > I've updated my canned response file with wxDev-C++. > It seems to be > gaining popularity anyway. Now if the debugger > became just as good as > the Visual Studio debugger, I'd be forced to make > some really hard choices. > > -- > Thomas Hruska > CubicleSoft President > Ph: 517-803-4197 > > *NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1 > Get on task. Stay on task. > > http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/ > > ______________________________________________ Web Revelación Yahoo! 2007: Premio Favorita del Público. http://es.promotions.yahoo.com/revelacion2007/favoritos/
