John Matthews wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "John Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --- In [email protected], "John Matthews" <jm5678@> wrote:
>>> --- In [email protected], Thomas Hruska <thruska@> wrote:
>>>> But who uses Pascal any more?
>>>> (With the sole exception of the InnoSetup installer, 
>>>> Pascal is pretty much a dead language).
>>> And Delphi?
>>> http://www.codegear.com/products/delphi/win32
>> ...although on the 'Overview' page they call it 'the Delphi language',
>> and Pascal isn't mentioned at all. On the 'Reasons to Buy' page they
>> call it 'the Object Pascal-based Delphi language'.
> 
> Also, I was sitting next to a (UK) college lecturer on the train the
> other day, and she said they still teach students Pascal to get them
> started in programming.
> 
> You could argue they should teach something the students are more
> likely to use in their jobs, but perhaps they feel Pascal is better
> for getting concepts across. I must admit I was surprised.
> 
> (This was only one college - I don't know how many others take this
> approach.)

Actually, that is pretty common.  I don't see any particular differences 
between C and Pascal that would make Pascal "ideal" for learning. 
Basically, such thinking is leftover from days of yore.

If you want to simply teach the basics of programming (if-then-else, for 
loops, displaying information, doing lightweight data processing, etc.) 
without all the issues of a compiled language, then start with PHP. 
Preferably the latest PHP 5.x (since PHP 4 is on its last legs and only 
with PHP 5 did it actually begin to look and behave like a real 
programming language).  At the very least, it would be relevant for a 
resume.

-- 
Thomas Hruska
CubicleSoft President
Ph: 517-803-4197

*NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1
Get on task.  Stay on task.

http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/

Reply via email to