In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED], cabal-devel@haskell.org writes: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > > > Would you like to have separate option flags in cpphs for stripping > > > > the different kinds of C comment? e.g. --strip and --stripAnsi? > > > > > > Separate options would resuscitate the Hugs build, so yes please. > > > How about --strip-traditional or --strip-c89? > > > > OK, done. The new option is --strip-c89. > > Thanks. Now we have a conundrum: should Cabal 1.2 use the new option, > and thus require the latest cpphs, or stick with the old option and be > broken with the new cpphs? Cabal only invokes cpphs for non-GHC builds, > so I'd say use it.
Cabal knows the version of cpphs so it can use the new flag or the old one depending on the version of cpphs being used. Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
