Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 22:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > In particular, we could swap --strip back to mean
> > what it used to mean (the current --strip-c89 behaviour), and find a
> > new name for the eol-stripping flag.
>
> That seems to be the right way IMHO.
OK, done. The new option name is --strip-eol, and --strip-c89 is gone.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
