On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:38:41PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED], > cabal-devel@haskell.org writes: > > Thanks. Now we have a conundrum: should Cabal 1.2 use the new option, > > and thus require the latest cpphs, or stick with the old option and be > > broken with the new cpphs? Cabal only invokes cpphs for non-GHC builds, > > so I'd say use it. > > Cabal knows the version of cpphs so it can use the new flag or the old one > depending on the version of cpphs being used.
OK, so time to bump the version number of cpphs, then? _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
