[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70?page=comments#action_55182 ]
Felipe Leme commented on CACTUS-70:
-----------------------------------
PS: I researched a little bit more, and looks like the XML is generated by the
JUnit Ant Task. From CactusTask:
private void executeInContainer(Container theContainer,
DeployableFile theFile)
{
Enumeration tests = getIndividualTests();
while (tests.hasMoreElements())
{
JUnitTest test = (JUnitTest) tests.nextElement();
execute(test); // CactusTask extends JunitTask, so this
method is handled by JUnit
}
}
}
So, looks like option 2.1 would also require hacking JUnit :-(
Another option would be adding an intermediate XLST transformation to add the
server in the xmls, but I guess that would make the tests even slower :-(
> junit report should include the server names
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CACTUS-70
> URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70
> Project: Cactus
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Maven Integration
> Environment: Operating System: Other
> Platform: Other
> Reporter: Brett Porter
> Fix For: 1.7
> Attachments: cactus-report.html
>
> Running cactus tests under multiple application servers results in multiple
> entries in the report for each different test - one for each server, however
> none of these are clarified by server.
> It would be good to either clarify the test names with the server, group the
> test results by server, or perhaps produce a separate report by server.
> Having test results all in one report but grouped by server would be my
> preference.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
