[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70?page=comments#action_55183 ] Felipe Leme commented on CACTUS-70: -----------------------------------
Ok, after a little bit more thinking, here is a doable solution: change the <cactustag:junitreport> tag. Right now, it creates just one junitreport XML with all condensed server; we could change it to create one junitreport XML for each server and then merge all XMLs in one big XML - the only difference in the final result is that we would add the <server> tag Once we have the results grouped by server, we have more freedom on how to define the new layout (we could even add info about the server itself, like port, jdk version, diretctory, etc...) > junit report should include the server names > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: CACTUS-70 > URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70 > Project: Cactus > Type: Improvement > Components: Maven Integration > Environment: Operating System: Other > Platform: Other > Reporter: Brett Porter > Fix For: 1.7 > Attachments: cactus-report.html > > Running cactus tests under multiple application servers results in multiple > entries in the report for each different test - one for each server, however > none of these are clarified by server. > It would be good to either clarify the test names with the server, group the > test results by server, or perhaps produce a separate report by server. > Having test results all in one report but grouped by server would be my > preference. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
