[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70?page=comments#action_55223 ] Felipe Leme commented on CACTUS-70: -----------------------------------
Vincent, Regarding the Ant task you proposed in the devs list (which would extends junitreport): would it handle multiple servers or would it a task for each server (and then we would glue all together with Jelly)? -- Felipe > junit report should include the server names > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: CACTUS-70 > URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-70 > Project: Cactus > Type: Improvement > Components: Maven Integration > Environment: Operating System: Other > Platform: Other > Reporter: Brett Porter > Fix For: 1.7 > Attachments: cactus-report.html > > Running cactus tests under multiple application servers results in multiple > entries in the report for each different test - one for each server, however > none of these are clarified by server. > It would be good to either clarify the test names with the server, group the > test results by server, or perhaps produce a separate report by server. > Having test results all in one report but grouped by server would be my > preference. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
