Hi again, On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:46:49 +0200, "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is in CVS HEAD at any time. Thus I would prefer not to do branches. I've had I agree with you, branches are hard to maintain. What I meant (and I think I was not clear) is that the 1.7.1 would be more of a checkpoint/tag than a branch. In other words, all new fixes to 1.7.1 would go to 1.8.0, not 1.7.2. > Otherwise we simply deliver the new <cactifyear> Ant task and the Maven > plugin remains unchanged. Ok, now I get it. The Ant integration didn't support cactifyear and Maven implemented it from scratch. Makes sense them - I was afraid people would get those nasty NoClassDefFound exceptions (which alone are hard to debug, imagine wrapped in a Jelly call :-). > Felipe, have you had a look at Magnus' patch? I think you're worrying > unnecessarily :-) Sorry, my bad... -- Felipe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
