As far as I can see the maven goal creates a new ear that is cactified. The Ant task on the other hand cactifies an existing ear. Both way should be supported eventually but maybe its a good idea to have the maven goal and the ant task seperated for this release.
So, how do we want it? Should I commit my changes to cactifyear or should we release a 1.7.1 first that is free from cargo dependencies? /Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:42 PM > To: 'Cactus Developers List' > Subject: RE: Cactus 1.7.1 > > > It's in jakarta-cactus/integration/maven/plugin.jelly (search > for "<goal > name="cactus:cactifyear""). > > Let us know if you need help in understanding it. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Magnus Grimsell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: lundi 25 avril 2005 15:33 > > To: Cactus Developers List > > Subject: RE: Cactus 1.7.1 > > > > Where is the source code or documentation for the cactifyear goal? > > I'm rather new to maven so it's a little bit confusing. > > > > /Magnus > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Felipe Leme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:03 PM > > > To: Cactus Developers List > > > Subject: RE: Cactus 1.7.1 > > > > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:46:49 +0200, "Vincent Massol" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > is in CVS HEAD at any time. Thus I would prefer not to do > > > branches. I've had > > > > > > I agree with you, branches are hard to maintain. What I meant > > > (and I think I was not clear) is that the 1.7.1 would be more > > > of a checkpoint/tag than a branch. In other words, all new > > > fixes to 1.7.1 would go to 1.8.0, not 1.7.2. > > > > > > > Otherwise we simply deliver the new <cactifyear> Ant task > > > and the Maven > > > > plugin remains unchanged. > > > > > > Ok, now I get it. The Ant integration didn't support > > > cactifyear and Maven implemented it from scratch. Makes sense > > > them - I was afraid people would get those nasty > > > NoClassDefFound exceptions (which alone are hard to debug, > > > imagine wrapped in a Jelly call :-). > > > > > > > Felipe, have you had a look at Magnus' patch? I think > > > you're worrying > > > > unnecessarily :-) > > > > > > Sorry, my bad... > > > > > > -- Felipe > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
